LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2009, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 7 May 2009 10:45:43 -0400
Reply-To:   "Fehd, Ronald J. (CDC/CCHIS/NCPHI)" <rjf2@CDC.GOV>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "Fehd, Ronald J. (CDC/CCHIS/NCPHI)" <rjf2@CDC.GOV>
Subject:   Re: Another SAS v. R thread
In-Reply-To:   <32872491.1241646328336.JavaMail.root@mswamui-thinleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

> From: Peter Flom > > Over on R-help, there is a big discussion on how great R is > for data manipulation. > > Most of it is just "R does it all, nothing else is needed" > some of it, though, is > "Why would anyone use SAS?" > > I don't know enough about data manipulation in either program > to say why SAS is better.

* not an S-Plus nor R user * attended some S-Plus classes and two nat'l conferences * have 17 years as a data manager * SAS users want to address columns in rows, saving history is important * opinion: S-Plus and R users are probably content to address and recode a set of values

Since most of the users I programmed for were not statisticians and I believe the majority of R users are probably statisticians or similarly hip to the issues I'd like to hear some more opinion as to how important saving history of data changes is to R users.

$0.02 <ka-ching>

Ron Fehd a previous S-Plus student CDC Atlanta GA USA RJF2 at cdc dot gov


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page