LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2009)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:30:45 +0200
Reply-To:   =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGEgR2FyY8OtYS1HcmFuZXJv?= <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGEgR2FyY8OtYS1HcmFuZXJv?= <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: McNemar Test
In-Reply-To:   <23B84AA2-4CE6-4C15-A69E-EEC156088720@gmail.com>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

Hi everybody

AJay Ohri wrote: > T test matched pairs > > Sent from my iPhone

Definitely NOT a solution, since McNemar tests handles BINARY outcomes, not continuous.

Sent from my desktop computer.

MGG > > On Sep 20, 2009, at 12:59 PM, "Handel, Richard W." <HandelRW@EVMS.EDU > <mailto:HandelRW@EVMS.EDU>> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> A colleague has asked for assistance in proposing an analysis for a >> 2X2 contigency table for matched pairs. I know that the McNemar test >> is normally appropriate, but at most, 20 matched pairs (40 subjects >> total) will be available for analysis. I am concerned that some >> cells may have very low frequency counts. What are my options? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Rick >> >>

-- For miscellaneous SPSS related statistical stuff, visit: http://gjyp.nl/marta/

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page