| Date: | Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:24:35 -0400 |
|---|
| Reply-To: | AJay Ohri <ohri2007@gmail.com> |
|---|
| Sender: | "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
|---|
| From: | AJay Ohri <ohri2007@gmail.com> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: McNemar Test |
|---|
|
| In-Reply-To: | <FD864CB3CC3CFD4DB6F8B5B1C87C9E14037F5B03@sato.evms.net> |
|---|
| Content-Type: | multipart/alternative; |
|---|
T test matched pairs
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 20, 2009, at 12:59 PM, "Handel, Richard W." <HandelRW@EVMS.EDU>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A colleague has asked for assistance in proposing an analysis for a
> 2X2 contigency table for matched pairs. I know that the McNemar
> test is normally appropriate, but at most, 20 matched pairs (40
> subjects total) will be available for analysis. I am concerned that
> some cells may have very low frequency counts. What are my options?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rick
>
>
[text/html]
|
