Date:         Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:30:45 +0200
Reply-To:     =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGEgR2FyY8OtYS1HcmFuZXJv?=
              <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGEgR2FyY8OtYS1HcmFuZXJv?=
              <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Subject:      Re: McNemar Test
In-Reply-To:  <23B84AA2-4CE6-4C15-A69E-EEC156088720@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

Hi everybody

AJay Ohri wrote:
> T test matched pairs
>
> Sent from my iPhone

Definitely NOT a solution, since McNemar tests handles BINARY outcomes,
not continuous.

Sent from my desktop computer.

MGG
>
> On Sep 20, 2009, at 12:59 PM, "Handel, Richard W." <HandelRW@EVMS.EDU
> <mailto:HandelRW@EVMS.EDU>> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> A colleague has asked for assistance in proposing an analysis for a
>> 2X2 contigency table for matched pairs.  I know that the McNemar test
>> is normally appropriate, but at most, 20 matched pairs (40 subjects
>> total) will be available for analysis.  I am concerned that some
>> cells may have very low frequency counts.  What are my options?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>


--
For miscellaneous SPSS related statistical stuff, visit:
http://gjyp.nl/marta/

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD