LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2009)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:05:19 -0600
Reply-To:     ViAnn Beadle <vab88011@gmail.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         ViAnn Beadle <vab88011@gmail.com>
Subject:      Re: Tail wagging dog
Comments: To: John F Hall <johnfhall@orange.fr>
In-Reply-To:  <3685B9D7ACCF4565ADB9F47972F8FD82@yourg2asvv4l2m>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

SPSS the product does what you tell it to do so I'm not sure that your analogy works.

SPSS the company has never tried to be an evangelist for new and experimental approaches to data analysis but has continued to expand its statistical offerings to be competitive.

For example, as survey research segued into new types of analysis for categorical data. Lazersfeldian elaboration analysis (ca. 1948) beget loglinear analysis (ca. 1980) beget GEE, generalized linear models, the Leiden contributions, etc. So SPSS the company added those kinds of stats. In addition, in support of survey research, SPSS has also added missing value analysis, codebooks, data validation, multiple imputation, raking, etc. So I don't think that predictive analysis and business requirements have "taken over".

From: John F Hall [mailto:johnfhall@orange.fr] Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 10:24 AM To: ViAnn Beadle; Bruce Weaver; spssx-l@listserv.uga.edu Cc: Martin Holt Subject: Tail wagging dog

Viann, Bruce

Car drives driver, cart drives horse, etc., etc?

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/341850.html helps to explain the meaning of the phrase "tail wagging the dog", but a better example is from Angus Campbell's article in ISSJ 1974 about how to develop and maintain research centres.

Quoting someone else's maxim, he states that it is important that administrators in research institutes understand that there are three groups of people more important than administrators, "the research scientists, the research scientists, and the research scientists". I feel the same way about SPSS, statisticians and computer programmers.

I had a similar problem once with an administrator trying to tell academics how to run the department, in particular my course. She got very upset whan I told her it was her job to make my life easier, not the other way round. That's why I always did my own administration in the Survey Research Unit. The only time I allowed an admin person anywhere near a project led to financial disaster.

Probably extreme, but that's what I mean by "tail wagging dog". SPSS is there to do what I tell it, not the other way round, but nowadays predictive analysis and business requirements seem to have taken over from survey research.

Does that explain or not?

John


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page