LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2009, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:23:19 -0500
Reply-To:     Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Subject:      Re: Slightly OT: Graphic of Unemployment in the United States
Comments: To: Jonathan Goldberg <jgoldberg@BIOMEDSYS.COM>


I was quite willing to leave this with agreeing to disagree, but you can't "complete disagree" with my statement that I find something confusing.

I don't know if I saw the map in its original colors, I looked at the version found at: statistics-of-a-deadly-campaign-the-minard-map/

or, in short form:

But, even though both Wainer and Tufte had high accolades for that map, I still have high doubts that the general public would take the time to understand what it contains. Since my own audience is the general public, again, I wouldn't use the technique as I find that including too much information defeats the purpose of conveying or supporting an idea.

Art --------- On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:02:47 -0500, Jonathan Goldberg <jgoldberg@BIOMEDSYS.COM> wrote:

>I completely disagree with: > >"What the author identifies as "the best graph ever made" is one that is so >confusing (to me) that I would never try to replicate the methods used as >I'm sure it would totally confuse at least some readers." > >It helps to see it in good resolution and color. The graph is indeed >amazing in packing a lot of information onto one page in clear, easy to >decode form. > >Like Wainer and Tufte (AKA god) I think that in almost all cases more >information is better if it can be done clearly. > >As a general rule, concerning graphics, Tufte is right. Think hard before >disagreeing with him.

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page