LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2010, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:12:17 -0500
Reply-To:     Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@mindspring.com>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@MINDSPRING.COM>
Subject:      Re: proc mixed: multicolinearity
Comments: To: Ching <kcwong5@GMAIL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Ching <kcwong5@GMAIL.COM> wrote

> >I'm testing the possible multicollinearity among the fixed effects in >proc mixed model with the option corrb in the model statement but >wondering whether I should specify method=reml or method=ml? > >Your help is greatly appreciated. Have a good week.

Corrb shows correlations. Correlations are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions for collienarity.

The proper collearity diagnostics are condition indexes, but, AFAIK, they are only available in SAS through PROC REG. Since collinearity is an effect of only the independent variables, you can often "fake" the diagnostic by using PROC REG; this works, e.g. where the main analysis is PROC LOGISTIC or some such.

But I am not sure about mixed models. You could check for collinearity at each time point, or each cluster; if it existed there, that would be a problem. But I am not sure if this is the ideal solution.

Peter

Peter L. Flom, PhD Statistical Consultant Website: http://www DOT statisticalanalysisconsulting DOT com/ Writing; http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/582880/peter_flom.html Twitter: @peterflom


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page