LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2010)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:27:24 +0100
Reply-To:     García-Granero <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         García-Granero <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Subject:      Re: GLM Univariate
In-Reply-To:  <874889.867.qm@web76109.mail.sg1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Eins Bernardo wrote: > Why is the posthoc goes like that? >

By default, SPSS uses the residual MS to compute Post-hoc tests. In a nested design, since the F test is computed dividing MS(Group) by MS(Set), you need that Post-hoc tests uses the same MS to compute the SE(diff.) for the means comparisons.

HTH, Marta > > > > Be careful when running POST-HOC comparisons for Group (in case of > a significant result at Group level): > > /POSTHOC = Group ( TUKEY ) vs Set(Group) > /DESIGN = Group Set(Group). > > Regards, > Marta > > -- For miscellaneous SPSS related statistical stuff, visit: > http://gjyp.nl/marta/ >

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page