LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2010, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:35:44 -0800
Reply-To:   uozz2 <javipgm@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   uozz2 <javipgm@GMAIL.COM>
Organization:   http://groups.google.com
Subject:   SS type I,II,III,IV
Comments:   To: sas-l@uga.edu
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi I do not understand why, in the next example, type III SS(A) is greater than type II SS(A). Type III SSA is SC(A/B,A*B,X) while Type II SSA is SC(A/B,X) so, should not be always greater type II SS than type III SS?

data one;input a b y x; cards; 1 1 3.1 2 1 1 5 4.1 2 1 6 6 2 1 8 8.6 1 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 4.9 2 2 4.2 5 ; proc glm data=one;class a b;model y=a b a*b x / ss1 ss2 ss3 ss4; run; Source DF Type II SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

a 1 0.00114134 0.00114134 0.01 0.9472 b 1 4.48520264 4.48520264 20.34 0.0204 a*b 1 0.17922373 0.17922373 0.81 0.4337 x 1 4.36355090 4.36355090 19.79 0.0211

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F

a 1 0.04119809 0.04119809 0.19 0.6947 b 1 3.61338699 3.61338699 16.39 0.0271 a*b 1 0.17922373 0.17922373 0.81 0.4337 x 1 4.36355090 4.36355090 19.79 0.0211

Thanks for your help

Javier


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page