LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2010)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:18:09 -0500
Reply-To:   Dave Taber <dave@novaquant.com>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Dave Taber <dave@novaquant.com>
Subject:   Re: Net Promoter Score syntax
Comments:   To: Mark Webb <targetlinkmark@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:   <4B9A1FAA.60709@googlemail.com>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Mark:

this is a previous post i sent out in 2007 to Tanya - as for the NP score itself, i'm not a big fan -- your question is referenced toward the end

Tanya:

don't know if there is an answer to your question but when you calculate the net promoter (NP) score, the z-test is not applicable. The reason for this is that when when you track this measure you may be double-counting a change in the proportion of respondents. This is because when the proportion who answered 9 or 10 goes up by 1 pct point you will be doubling that increase if the proportion who answered 1 to 6 decreased by 1 pct point.

The resulting NP score is actually not a proportion -- it's just a calculated score. You would expect much greater variation with a NP score than a top 2-box percentage.

on a separate note, an easy way to track net promoter scores in spss is to recode 9-10 to +100, 7-8 to 0, and 1-6 (or 0-6) to -100 -- then just compare the mean of the new variable over over time.

you might want to check with the company that advocates this technique http://www.satmetrix.com/netpromoter/index.htm to see what they say about statistical differences over time

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Webb <targetlinkmark@gmail.com> wrote: > Some market researchers compute a score called Net Promoter Score. > > I'm trying to write syntax for this score but am struggling. > Has anyone does this? - any assistance will be appreciated. > > NPS is computed from an 11 point scale [0-10] of recommendation where 10 > = Extremely Likely to Recommend. > > The 11 point scale is reduced to 3 points > 0-6 = Detractors > 7-8 = Passives > 9-10 = Promoters > > The NPS = %Promoters - %Detractors > > An example - > > Detractors 10% > Passives 30% > Promoters 60% > > NPS = 60-10=40 > > The only data I have is a rating from each respondent on the 0-10 > scale-one variable. > I'm struggling to compute the percentages into new variables so that I > can subtract them. > > As the percentages will vary if a filter is applied it will be necessary > to recalculate for each new filter. > Regards > > -- > Mark Webb > > Line +27 (21) 786 4379 > Cell +27 (72) 199 1000 > Fax to email +27 (86) 5513075 > Skype webbmark > Email targetlinkmark@gmail.com > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD >

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page