| Date: | Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:44:07 +0800 |
| Reply-To: | "John(Jiangtang) Hu" <jiangtanghu@GMAIL.COM> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | "John(Jiangtang) Hu" <jiangtanghu@GMAIL.COM> |
| Subject: | Re: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata... |
| In-Reply-To: | <8C5F8DF18B90FA43BB9B356227F812D5023021E8@KFSVS6.utk.tennessee.edu> |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
|---|
Interesting post. For the popularity of programming languages(including
statistical packages), TIOBE Programming Community Index would be
informative(updated:* *June 2010):
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
In Index(June 2010), SAS is #1 among statistical packages (rank 14/100 among
all programming languages. C/C++/Java are in Top 3 ). Others:
Matlab: 18/100
Fortran: 31/100
Maple, Mathematica, R, SPSS: in [#51 to #100] for their differences are
> relatively small.
This Index counts the hits of the most popular search engines(Google, MSN,
Yahoo!, Wikipedia and YouTube) with the query +"<language> programming".
---------
John(Jiangtang) HU
jiangtanghu@gmail.com
+86 138-1171-7765
http://www.jiangtanghu.com/
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Muenchen, Robert A (Bob)
<muenchen@utk.edu>wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been fiddling around with various ways to estimate the popularity
> of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata, JMP, Minitab, Statistica, Systat, BMDP, S-PLUS,
> R-PLUS and Revolution R. It's not an easy task. You can see what I've
> come up with so far at http://r4stats.com/popularity . I'm sure people
> will have plenty of ideas on how to improve this, so please let me know
> what you think.
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
> =========================================================
> Bob Muenchen (pronounced Min'-chen), Manager
> Research Computing Support
> Voice: (865) 974-5230
> Email: muenchen@utk.edu
> Web: http://oit.utk.edu/research,
> News: http://oit.utk.edu/research/news.php
> Feedback: http://oit.utk.edu/feedback/
> =========================================================
>
|