Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 12:50:36 -0400
Reply-To: Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Subject: Re: What do we have to do to SAVE SAS-L
Actually, as of the end of July, Toby is back in the top 10 again.
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:40:38 -0700, Choate, Paul@DDS
>The real problem is that Toby started taking adhd meds and quit posting
300 posts a day. (j/k)
>Now he's going to hunt me down and shoot me like the hell-bent Texan he
>DDS Data Extraction
>From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of
>Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:12 AM
>Subject: Re: What do we have to do to SAVE SAS-L
>"Data _null_;" <iebupdte@GMAIL.COM> wrote
>>Perhaps the PRIVATE response is part of the problem. I don't see the
>>point in participating in SAS-L if you are not going to post replies
>>to the group.
>I agree, with some very rare exceptions.
>For instance, if the poster has made a very obvious error, I may respond
privately. It could embarrass the poster, and doesn't seem to add value
to the site.
>Also "little birdies" sometimes reply off list.
>But in general, I learn a tremendous amount by following threads.
>Peter L. Flom, PhD
>Website: http://www DOT statisticalanalysisconsulting DOT com/