Date:         Fri, 6 Aug 2010 12:50:36 -0400
Reply-To:     Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Subject:      Re: What do we have to do to SAVE SAS-L
Comments: To: Paul Choate REPRO NOACK <Paul.Choate@DDS.CA.GOV>

Paul,

Actually, as of the end of July, Toby is back in the top 10 again.

Art
---------
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:40:38 -0700, Choate, Paul@DDS
<Paul.Choate@DDS.CA.GOV> wrote:

>The real problem is that Toby started taking adhd meds and quit posting
300 posts a day.  (j/k)
>
>Now he's going to hunt me down and shoot me like the hell-bent Texan he
is.
>
>=)
>
>Paul Choate
>DDS Data Extraction
>(916) 654-2160
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of
Peter Flom
>Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:12 AM
>To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>Subject: Re: What do we have to do to SAVE SAS-L
>
>"Data _null_;" <iebupdte@GMAIL.COM> wrote
>
>>Perhaps the PRIVATE response is part of the problem.  I don't see the
>>point in participating in SAS-L if you are not going to post replies
>>to the group.
>>
>
>I agree, with some very rare exceptions.
>
>For instance, if the poster has made a very obvious error, I may respond
privately.  It could embarrass the poster, and doesn't seem to add value
to the site.
>
>Also "little birdies" sometimes reply off list.
>
>But in general, I learn a tremendous amount by following threads.
>
>Peter
>
>Peter L. Flom, PhD
>Statistical Consultant
>Website: http://www DOT statisticalanalysisconsulting DOT com/
>Writing; http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/582880/peter_flom.html
>Twitter:   @peterflom