LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2010)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:01:45 +0200
Reply-To:   Marta García-Granero <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Marta García-Granero <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: same data, same test with different procedures =different results USING 19.0
In-Reply-To:   <6CB840B99C41D64197D3778C545C70C8536C55237E@EXLOYCMS.ad.loyola.edu>
Content-Type:   multipart/alternative;

El 22/10/2010 2:11, Martin Sherman escribió: > > Dear List; I just tested a sample distribution using the One Sample > Kolmogorow-Smirnov Test under Non-Parametric Tests---One sample K-S > test and get a K-S Z of .933 with a p value of .349. Indicating that > my sample is consistent with a population that is normally > distributed. I then went and used the Explore procedure and looked at > the results of the K-S test and get some very different results. The > statistic reported is .070 and the p value is .034. I am not sure > what is happening here. Does anyone have any ideas. Thanks, martin > > > *Martin F. Sherman, Ph.D.* > > *Professor of Psychology* > > *Director of Masters Education: Thesis Track > *Loyola College of Arts and Sciences > > ** > Hi Martin:

This difference can be found since SPSS 4.0 (PC+ I think its name was). It is not specific of SPSS 19.

The difference is due to the fact that One sample KS (under Non parametric tests) computes Kolmogorov-Smirnv test WITHOUT the Lilliefors correction, and EXPLORE computes the test WITH Lilliefors correction (to adjust the test to the fact that the sample mean&sd are used, instead of the corresponding parameters mu and sigma). Don't use the first one, since it is over conservative. As a matter of fact, DON'T use the second (KS with Lilliefors correction) either, since Shapiro-Wilk test has been proven to be better (the best, I might add).

Best regards, Marta GG

-- For miscellaneous SPSS related statistical stuff, visit: http://gjyp.nl/marta/


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page