| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:01:45 +0200 |
| Reply-To: | Marta García-Granero <mgarciagranero@gmail.com> |
| Sender: | "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | Marta García-Granero <mgarciagranero@gmail.com> |
| Subject: | Re: same data,
same test with different procedures =different results USING 19.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <6CB840B99C41D64197D3778C545C70C8536C55237E@EXLOYCMS.ad.loyola.edu> |
| Content-Type: | multipart/alternative;
|
|---|
El 22/10/2010 2:11, Martin Sherman escribió:
>
> Dear List; I just tested a sample distribution using the One Sample
> Kolmogorow-Smirnov Test under Non-Parametric Tests---One sample K-S
> test and get a K-S Z of .933 with a p value of .349. Indicating that
> my sample is consistent with a population that is normally
> distributed. I then went and used the Explore procedure and looked at
> the results of the K-S test and get some very different results. The
> statistic reported is .070 and the p value is .034. I am not sure
> what is happening here. Does anyone have any ideas. Thanks, martin
>
>
> *Martin F. Sherman, Ph.D.*
>
> *Professor of Psychology*
>
> *Director of Masters Education: Thesis Track
> *Loyola College of Arts and Sciences
>
> **
>
Hi Martin:
This difference can be found since SPSS 4.0 (PC+ I think its name was).
It is not specific of SPSS 19.
The difference is due to the fact that One sample KS (under Non
parametric tests) computes Kolmogorov-Smirnv test WITHOUT the Lilliefors
correction, and EXPLORE computes the test WITH Lilliefors correction (to
adjust the test to the fact that the sample mean&sd are used, instead of
the corresponding parameters mu and sigma). Don't use the first one,
since it is over conservative. As a matter of fact, DON'T use the second
(KS with Lilliefors correction) either, since Shapiro-Wilk test has been
proven to be better (the best, I might add).
Best regards,
Marta GG
--
For miscellaneous SPSS related statistical stuff, visit:
http://gjyp.nl/marta/
[text/html]
|