|Date: ||Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:21:21 -0800|
|Reply-To: ||JR <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Sender: ||"SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||JR <email@example.com>|
|Subject: ||Re: logistic regression|
|Content-Type: ||text/plain; charset=us-ascii|
I did not include interactions. Would it be better to include them? The
syntax is correct, I think. The predictors correlate with each other. Could
this be the problem? I have read that it is only a problem, if the
correlation is about .80?
In the models, including only one or two predictors (each significant), the
Hosmer-Lemshow Test is also significant, indicating a bad model fit? I dont
know, what to do now. Would a stepwise logistic regression be better? Should
I exclude predictors?
Hope, you can help me!
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/logistic-regression-tp3284334p3285704.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command