LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2010, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 3 Nov 2010 05:32:05 -0400
Reply-To:     peterflomconsulting@mindspring.com
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@MINDSPRING.COM>
Subject:      Re: Multinomial Logit-Insignificant pvalues
Comments: To: Pam Shin <pg2003sf@YAHOO.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <201011030608.oA34iF8R032475@willow.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Pam Shin wrote

<<<, I am building a MNL model that has three outcomes. However for some of the covariates, the pvalue for chi-sq statistics comes up as insignificant for one of the outcomes. Is that a problem? Does this imply that this variable should not be part of model?

Any insight, input would be very helpful. >>>>

First, you shouldn't really be deciding on covariates based on p-values (although many people do)

Second, could you provide some context?

Third, for the particular case where a variable's effects are large at one comparison and small at others, I'd look at the actual values and the actual comparisons and see what made substantive sense. One possibility is to do TWO separate logistics, each dichotomous.

But, with all that said, and taken as cautions, in general, I'm inclined to include variables that make a difference.

Peter Peter Flom PhD. Peter Flom Consulting LLC 5 Penn Plaza, Ste 2342 NY NY 10001 www.statisticalanalysisconsulting.com www.IAmLearningDisabled.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page