LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2011)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:19:25 -0800
Reply-To:     J McClure <mc006@pacbell.net>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         J McClure <mc006@pacbell.net>
Subject:      Re: statistical test for 2x8 table with small expected values
Comments: To: Art@DrKendall.org
In-Reply-To:  <4D2B74FC.4080000@DrKendall.org>
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> Yes, thanks Art. I guess I had a brain fart (again). <br> Thanks to you and the others on the listserv for providing such a valuable service.<br> Jan<br> <u><br> If I understand correctly what you have</u>, the cells and margins of the 4 way crosstab should have all that you need.<br> Here is the output from the simulation.&nbsp; Does it have what you need?<br> <br> On 1/10/2011 1:07 PM, Art Kendall wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:4D2B74FC.4080000@DrKendall.org" type="cite">oops it would be 4 way like this. <br> <br> new file. <br> set seed 20110110. <br> input program. <br> loop id = 1 to 482. <br> compute depression&nbsp; = RV.BERNOULLI(.10). <br> compute PTSD&nbsp; = RV.BERNOULLI(.04). <br> compute alcohol&nbsp; = RV.BERNOULLI(.10). <br> compute suicidal =&nbsp; RV.BERNOULLI(.10). <br> end case. <br> end loop. <br> end file. <br> end input program. <br> formats id (f3) depression to alcohol (f1). <br> value labels&nbsp; depression to suicidal 0 'no' 1 'yes' . <br> CROSSTABS tables = depression by suicidal&nbsp; by PTSD by alcohol <br> &nbsp;/cells = all <br> &nbsp;/method =exact. <br> <br> <br> Art <br> <br> On 1/10/2011 3:59 PM, Art Kendall wrote: <br> <blockquote type="cite">It appears that the METHOD=EXACT specification in CROSSTABS might be what you need. <br> The simulation in the syntax below ran in a few seconds. <br> It assumes depression occurs in 10% of cases, PTSD in 4 %, depression in 10%. You can change the RV arguments to be more like your actual situation. <br> <br> Open a new instance of SPSS. Paste the syntax in a syntax window. Run it. <br> Is this what you need? <br> <br> Art Kendall <br> Social Research Consultants <br> <br> new file. <br> set seed 20110110. <br> input program. <br> loop id = 1 to 482. <br> compute depression&nbsp; = RV.BERNOULLI(.10). <br> compute PTSD&nbsp; = RV.BERNOULLI(.04). <br> compute alcohol&nbsp; = RV.BERNOULLI(.10). <br> end case. <br> end loop. <br> end file. <br> end input program. <br> formats id (f3) depression to alcohol (f1). <br> value labels&nbsp; depression to alcohol 0 'no' 1 'yes' . <br> CROSSTABS tables = depression by PTSD by alcohol <br> &nbsp;/cells = all <br> &nbsp;/method =exact. <br> <br> <br> On 1/10/2011 2:06 PM, J McClure wrote: <br> <blockquote type="cite">Hi, <br> From a survey I have three clinical characteristics&nbsp; (depression, PTSD, <br> and alcohol misuse) which are either present (yes) or not present (no). <br> I also have the answers to multiple questions about suicidal thoughts <br> and behaviors which I have collapsed into a dichotomous variable of yes <br> or no. <br> I want to see if the proportion of respondents answering positively to <br> each of the questions differs by whether they have one or more of the <br> clinical characteristics. <br> So, I created a variable of clinical characteristics (Clin_Char) with 8 <br> categories which represent all possible combinations including none and <br> all three characteristics. <br> The problem is that with an n of 482, the numbers are small for three of <br> the categories and when I do a chi-squared test there are cells with an <br> inadequate expected value. <br> Collapsing categories or dropping some categories would loose <br> information but it seems since the contingency table is bigger than 2x2 <br> I can't use Yates correction Fisher's exact test. <br> Suggestions? <br> Thanks, <br> Jan <br> <br> ===================== <br> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to <br> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU">LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU</a> (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the <br> command. To leave the list, send the command <br> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L <br> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command <br> INFO REFCARD <br> <br> </blockquote> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote> </body> </html>

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page