LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2011, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:35:41 -0800
Reply-To:     "DUELL, BOB (ATTCINW)" <BD9439@ATT.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "DUELL, BOB (ATTCINW)" <BD9439@ATT.COM>
Subject:      Re: Frustration With SAS - My Vote for most poorly implemented
              Programming Language "Feature"
In-Reply-To:  <784D3CE07FA3439AB78BC313DBC37D76@D1871RB1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

My biggest frustration is with the new 9.2 online doc. It's very difficult to find what I want, even if I already know what "book" it's in. A simple index of all the "books" would be nice.

Plus, many document's make reference to other documents, but only as a bolded text string. I was trying to read up about changes to SAS/CONNECT today and the page says "Details about the security technologies that SAS supports have been relocated from this document to Encryption in SAS". Yes, I typed that into the search box and found 270 references to that phrase, but a hyperlink would have been so much easier.

When I need to find the syntax for a function or the proper spelling of a format, I also go back to the old 9.1 online doc. That application is so much easier to use, at least for me.

Bob

-----Original Message----- From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Nat Wooding Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:04 PM To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Frustration With SAS - My Vote for most poorly implemented Programming Language "Feature"

TJ

Assuming that you are referring to doing a keyword search of the on-line docs, in the drop down list of products, click on the product that you want to scan .

Nat wooding

-----Original Message----- From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of T J Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:55 PM To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Frustration With SAS - My Vote for most poorly implemented Programming Language "Feature"

Totally agree with Dale on the matrix functionalities be part of BASE SAS.

I would add another one here:

For the online help, there should be a limiting mechanism to limit the key word search to, e.g. BASE SAS only. Right now a search will bring back all the items from all the products, too much of a good thing!

Happy New Year!

-TJ

On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 11:24:08 -0800, Dale McLerran <stringplayer_2@YAHOO.COM> wrote in PART:

>Taking the "Fun with SAS" and "Love with SAS" threads in a new >direction, what is the feature of SAS which frustrates you the >most. For me, it has to be - hands down - the lack of common >matrix operations in data step code and the really pathetic >attempts to make matrix operations available via the FCMP >procedure. > [snipped] >I have said before and I will say again that in the arena of >statistical analysis, SI is going to have their lunch eaten by >R and other statistical programming languages which allow matrix >operations as part of their base package. > [snipped] >---------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page