LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2011)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:45:15 -0400
Reply-To:     Rich Ulrich <rich-ulrich@live.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Rich Ulrich <rich-ulrich@live.com>
Subject:      Re: outliers - casewise listing of residuals and standardized
              residuals
Comments: To: chuiling23@yahoo.com
In-Reply-To:  <582653.41927.qm@web120515.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"

> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:39:19 -0700 > From: chuiling23@yahoo.com > Subject: RE: outliers - casewise listing of residuals and standardized > residuals > To: spssx-l@listserv.uga.edu; rich-ulrich@live.com > > > Three problematic predictors: > > (1) No. of board meeting – skewness (3.4) > > (2) Firm’s asset – in dollar, skewness (17.3) > > (3) No. of subsidiary – skewness (7.7) > > > > N is 800. In general, the model is significant but R^2 is quite > low(10%). I have yet to decide what to do about those extreme cases. > Different textbooks give different suggestions. >

It might be because I groom my variables before I look at skewness, but I've usually been concerned with skewness between 0.35 and 1.5. I'm not even convinced that it is possible to have skewness of 17.3 or 7.7. - Would you describe one set of those values?

"Board meetings" - In a model, I think I would be expect to see groupings of, say, "daily/ weekly/ monthly/ annually/ less". That grouping not going to come out very weird for skewness, but I *might* suspect that it is non-linear and *needs* categories, depending on the outcome variable.

"Firm's assets" - Are you trying to model across multinationals, down to the corner grocery? Assets seems a natural for taking a log, but it also seems natural to create a model without the world's full range of possibilities.

"No. of subsidiaries" - This also seems like something that deserves to put into manageable groups, either to analyze as categories or to create a reasonable "scale" on which I might expect a linear relation to outcome.

-- Rich Ulrich

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page