Date:         Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:00:43 -0800
Reply-To:     David Marso <david.marso@gmail.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         David Marso <david.marso@gmail.com>
Subject:      Re: help with creating a case summary report grouped by region by
              program type
In-Reply-To:  <6C163DDC2FC8994C99F8E837F41CCF59011CA378@CTSPITDCEMMVX28.cihs.ad.gov.on.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Wouldn't this be much more manageable if you didn't have your variables of
interest splattered all over the place in the file.  Why not simply create 3
new variables which are created dependent upon your current filters, then
just summarize these within your choice of split file logic?  I am not sure
why you would organize your data in the current manner.  It makes life a
living hell whenever you need to do any sort of comparative analysis.




--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/help-with-creating-a-case-summary-report-grouped-by-region-by-program-type-tp3407087p3408631.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD