| Date: | Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:40:52 -0700 |
|---|
| Reply-To: | drfg2008 <kontakt@datest.de> |
|---|
| Sender: | "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
|---|
| From: | drfg2008 <kontakt@datest.de> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: SPSS Macro |
|---|
| In-Reply-To: | <OF0A2F9960.54353251-ON87257875.004C3904-87257875.004C7D25@us.ibm.com> |
|---|
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
|---|
You should not worry about the time required to expand a macro. It will be
trivial compared to the time required to execute the generated syntax.
Well not for Montecarlo trials with hundreds of thousands of runs.
Python will be the better option.
Thanks
-----
Dr. Frank Gaeth
FU Berlin
--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/SPSS-Macro-tp4308532p4314222.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
| 
