LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2011)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:08:12 +0100
Reply-To:     Muir Houston <Muir.Houston@GLASGOW.AC.UK>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Muir Houston <Muir.Houston@GLASGOW.AC.UK>
Subject:      missing value issue
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Hi Listers, I have a scale of 28 items which correspond to 7 motivational constructs - now I run the syntax below: COMPUTE IMTK=SUM(Motiv_2, Motiv_9, Motiv_16, Motiv_23). COMPUTE IMTA=SUM(Motiv_6, Motiv_13, Motiv_20, Motiv_27). COMPUTE IMTES=SUM(Motiv_4, Motiv_11, Motiv_18, Motiv_25). COMPUTE EMID=SUM(Motiv_3, Motiv_10, Motiv_17, Motiv_24). COMPUTE EMIN=SUM(Motiv_7, Motiv_14, Motiv_21, Motiv_28). COMPUTE EMER=SUM(Motiv_1, Motiv_8, Motiv_15, Motiv_22). COMPUTE AMOT=SUM(Motiv_5, Motiv_12, Motiv_19, Motiv_26). EXECUTE. and I find that if one of the item values is missing then the construct is also missing - two questions - how would I get the syntax to give me a sum of all valid scores, and secondly what approaches would you suggest to deal with missing data in this instance? thanks Muir Dr Muir Houston Social Justice, Place and Lifelong Education Research School of Education College of Social Sciences University of Glasgow 0141-330-4699 R3L+ Project - Adult education in the light of the European Quality Strategy http://www.learning-regions.net/ <https://owa.gla.ac.uk/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.learning-regions.net/>

GINCO Project - Grundtvig International Network of Course Organisers http://www.ginconet.eu/ <https://owa.gla.ac.uk/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.ginconet.eu/>


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page