LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2012)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:37:51 -0800
Reply-To:   SiriusxTR <bokorbarna@yahoo.com>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   SiriusxTR <bokorbarna@yahoo.com>
Subject:   Re: correlation and regression for ordinal and nominal (dependent)
In-Reply-To:   <002001cce8e9$8ffba740$aff2f5c0$@gmail.com>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Wow, ViAnn Beadle, you are my hero!!!:))) Now I can uninstall the v.17:)) Really, some things are not written anywhere, and they are so hard to find! I thank you all for your help, it means so much to me!

Ok, I will write this down in detail. I have a sample of 556 patients with prostate cancer. Biopsies were taken before the surgical intervention. I grouped the positive no. of biopsies in 3 groups (Group 1 - 1-2 positive biopsies, Group 2 - 3-4 positive biopsies, Group 3 - 5-10 positive biopsies), so this would be the ordinal, independent variable. Biochemical relapse after intervention, a nominal, dichotomous variable, yes or no (involves a 3 year period).

Task: correlation and get info on how I could predict the relapse chances based on positive fragments group. Problem: Choosing the appropriate tests. I have read a lot in the past week, but it seems there is a problem with correlation between ordinal and nominal, no manual likes to talk about it, especially if the outcome variable is the nominal.

After a looooong studying period I have chosen Cramer's v and lambda, because books say that: Kendall-tau can be used only with 2 ordinals, tau-b if (no. columns=no. rows), tau-c if (no. columns<>no. rows), Pearson r only for scale and normally distributed, Spearman only with 2 ordinals, Gamma and Sommer's d only with 2 ordinals; and I quoted above from a book regarding the ordinal+nominal test that says Cramer's V is appropriate.

As I understand, nominal tests can be used for ordinals, some non-parametric for parametric, only you loose some power of the test (e.g. Wilcoxon for a normally distributed scale). But Cramer's and lambda gave me even this way positive, statistically significant results.:))

Now, I want to do a binomial logistic regression test, but first I have to learn about it more, and how to interpret it.

So Sommers'd for Kendall is like lambda for Cramer's???

It would be awesome to have a list which shows the tests paired in 3 , like: (test which shows existence of correlation )-(test for measure the power of the correlation) - (test for predicting the chances or calculating the outcome variable based on independent)

-- View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/correlation-and-regression-for-ordinal-and-nominal-dependent-tp5471812p5476605.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page