Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:46:44 -0600
Reply-To: Robin R High <rhigh@UNMC.EDU>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Robin R High <rhigh@UNMC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Non-inferiority Study
In-Reply-To: <201202201810.q1K5GaO0011052@wasabi.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
June,
A review of this code can help you work through non-inferiority
calculations. PROC TTEST works under the concept of equivalence, but the
lower bound can also be used for non-inferiority tests (replicated with
PROC MIXED). Also, with more than two class levels, PROC MIXED can
compute pvalues for non-inferiority directly from the file of LSMEAN
differences.
DATA vnue;
lvl = 'Control' ; do id = 1 to 9; y = 15 + rannor(928234); output; end;
lvl = '1 venue' ; do id = 1 to 9; y = 12 + rannor(0); output; end;
lvl = '2 venue' ; do id = 1 to 9; y = 11 + rannor(0); output; end;
RUN;
%let hxL = -3; * the means of ven 1 and ven 2 can be up to 3 units lower
than control (need to set this in the context of your data);
* change to -4 and observe difference in output;
ods exclude equality conflimits;
PROC TTEST DATA =vnue dist=normal tost(&hxL., 999); * large upper bound
-- not needed for non-inf ;
WHERE lvl IN ('Control', '1 venue');
CLASS lvl;
VAR y;
TITLE ;
run;
ODS OUTPUT diffs=dfs;
ODS SELECT lsmeans covparms tests3;
PROC MIXED DATA=vnue ;
WHERE lvl IN ('Control', '1 venue'); * remove this WHERE statement and
make both comparisons with one run;
CLASS lvl;
MODEL y = lvl;
* if computed 95% lower bound (enter alpha=.10 to get 5% lower interval)
is less than your specified non-inferiority limit,
then pvalue indicates cannot accept non-inferiority;
LSMEANS lvl / diff cl alpha=.10;
run;
DATA dfs; SET dfs;
NonInfLimit = &hxL. ;
tupr = (estimate - NonInfLimit )/stderr;
pv_upr= 1-probt(abs(tupr),df); * for non-inferiority test;
LowerBound = estimate - ABS(tinv(.05,df))*stderr; * shows how to compute
lower bound ;
run;
PROC PRINT DATA=dfs NOObs;
WHERE _lvl EQ 'Control';
VAR lvl _lvl LowerBound NonInfLimit lower Estimate StdErr DF tupr pv_upr ;
FORMAT t: 6.2 pv: pvalue6.4;
run;
Robin High
UNMC
From:
June Gothberg <jgothberg@YAHOO.COM>
To:
SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Date:
02/20/2012 12:10 PM
Subject:
Re: Non-inferiority Study
Sent by:
"SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Thank you for your reply Robin.
I conducted a study using a 3x3 LSD and have two replications of control
venue, venue 1, venue 2. So a total of 18 (2 - 3x3) or 9 each. There are
more participants, but I am using mean percent as I am measuring at the
level of venue. Does this give you enough information?
June