LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2012)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:55:34 -0700
Reply-To:     tvp <>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         tvp <>
Subject:      Re: linear regression:No variables were entered into the equation.
In-Reply-To:  <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Thank you for your suggestion.

But I have a lot of cases N = 3069, of which valid = 2982 and missing= 87 for this variable 18b. And even when I included only 2 independent varibles (several different ones) there was the same Warning and no otuput. I don't think it is possible that with such a large database and only 2 independent variables (with each only around 40 missing) that is the problem.

I'm still confused why it was computing the output when I un-selected the inclusion of a constant...

-- View this message in context: Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page