Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:49 +0000
Reply-To: "Burgess, Otto" <OBurgess@ATPCO.NET>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: "Burgess, Otto" <OBurgess@ATPCO.NET>
Subject: Re: base sas vs. r
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Yes, I do mean mainframe LPAR
There is a version for z out there, I just don't know anything about it yet
From: DUELL, BOB [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 4:07 PM
To: Burgess, Otto; SAS-L@listserv.uga.edu
Subject: RE: base sas vs. r
When you say "LPAR", do you mean a mainframe? I was not aware that R was available for a mainframe.
Of course, I've never used R either. Old dog here.
From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Burgess, Otto
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:04 AM
Subject: base sas vs. r
So we have base SAS and only base SAS licensed on one LPAR
We are debating moving some test systems from this LPAR to another and since they use SAS, it would need to be moved too, along with any processes that use SAS
I have suggested looking at using R instead of SAS
I have never used R myself
Does R mostly cover 100% of at least base SAS?