LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 1996, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 31 May 1996 15:43:00 -0400
Reply-To:     Brian Smith <smith@MSCF.UKY.EDU>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Brian Smith <smith@MSCF.UKY.EDU>
Organization: University of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Subject:      PROC Mixed question

This is one of those questions that is both a statistics question and a SAS question. I have two continuous variables which I hypothesize have a linear relationship. I have multiple observations per subject, thus it seems reasonable to use subject as a random effect. SAS code follows.

proc mixed; class subject; model y=x / s; random subject; run;

When I run this model, I am getting 0 as an estimate for the variance component. This seems completely unreasonable and I believe I might be making a mistake.

Statistics question: Under what circumstances would one get an estimate of 0?

SAS question: When I examine the SAS Log I get the following messages

Note: Estimated G matrix is not positive definite.

Note: At least one W.D format was too small for the number to be printed. The decimal may be shifted by the "BEST" format.

The first note just indicates that the estimate of the variance component was 0. What does the second note mean? Could there be a relationship between what this note is trying to tell me and the estimate that I am getting?

Sincerely,

Brian Smith, PhD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page