Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 14:54:29 +0100
Reply-To: John Whittington <johnw@MAG-NET.CO.UK>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From: John Whittington <johnw@MAG-NET.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Whoops! Re: CHI-SQUARE goodness-of-fit in easy form ??
On Thu, 25 Jul 1996, SFBAY0001 <sfbay0001@aol.com> wrote:
>If I am not mistaken, the EXACT test supported in PROC FREQ uses the
>hypergeometric probability distribution, NOT the chi-square distribution.
>It is sometimes referred to as "Fisher's Exact Test for a 2 by 2 table".
I'm getting slightly confused here. An 'exact' test is surely precisely
what it says - it is a statement of the exact probability of getting a table
'as extreme as' the one observed, given the marginal totals that one has.
As such, there is no need to refer to any theoretical distribution - one
(the computer!) simply counts up two lists of possibilities and divides one
by the other. Anything less than that may be a good *approximation* to an
'exact' method, but is not strictly '#exact'.
.. that's how I see it, anyway.
John
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 1296 730225
Mediscience Services Fax: +44 1296 738893
Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: johnw@mag-net.co.uk
Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK CompuServe: 100517,3677
-----------------------------------------------------------
|