Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 04:23:21 -0700
Reply-To: FRS--LiteWate <faith@FRSA.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From: FRS--LiteWate <faith@FRSA.COM>
Subject: Re: What option to pretty up CGI output?
At 08:25 AM 10/11/96 -0400, Jeanne M. Spicer wrote:
>I had the same problem. Go into Netscape's
> General Preferences...Font
>And change the Fixed Font to the SAS Monospace Font. That made the
>curvy f's turn into a dashed line. There may be other fixed fonts that
>will display correctly too, but I didn't explore further.
> Jeanne Spicer
> Penn State
>On Thu, 10 Oct 1996, Rdsdnen wrote:
>> OK... here's how I got it partially to obscure the output and it sure looks
>> a lot better in Netscape now ;)
>> options nocenter ls=120 ;
>> proc tabulate noseps formchar=' . .... . . . ...';
>> If there is a better way, please let me know?
>> Rdsdnen <email@example.com> wrote in article
>> > For example proc freq creates a line that looks like
>> > VARIABLE NAME
Jeanne, that solution is not a sufficient or global one. If one published
their SAS output on the web, she would have to write 'instructions' on how
to modify a web cruiser's browser preferences in order to properly view the
output. Is is a good idea to 'require' that folks modify their preferences
just to look at a web site??? Hmmm...
I'm researching a solution and I believe that it lies on the SAS Software
side rather than the client side.
Faith Renee Sloan (FRS ASSOCIATES) - A SAS Institute Quality Partner
firstname.lastname@example.org (WEB Site Design and Interactive Programming/SAS and Internet
http://www.frsa.com (world-wide-web home base)
http://www.frsa.com/bbpage.shtml BodyBuilding Page
a Pointgrrl for San Francisco Webgrrls
email@example.com -- http://www.webgrrls.com/sf