LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 1997)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 20 Feb 1997 12:53:02 -0600
Reply-To:     chelberg@spss.com
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Clay Helberg <chelberg@SPSS.COM>
Organization: SPSS, Inc.
Subject:      Re: Pareto Charts
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Kenneth B. Hill wrote: > > Can anyone give me some information and/or references to interpreting Parteo > Charts for quality control activities? > > Ken Hill, MS > Research Analyst > Oregon Health Division > ken_hill@class.orednet.org > > --

It's basically just a sorted bar chart, with the bars organized from highest to lowest. It is used to prioritize or rank factors such as sources of variance, causes of defects, etc. So, for example, you can do a pareto chart of counts of different types of customer complaints, and get an idea of what is bothering your customers the most. Then you can focus your improvement activities on those things that are complained about most, getting the most "bang for your buck".

It's a pretty standard technique, so I'd expect that most quality books would have something to say about it. A specific example I'm aware of is Carey & Lloyd, _Measuring Quality Improvement in Health Care: A Guide to Statistical Process Control Applications_.

--Clay -- Clay Helberg | Internet: helberg@execpc.com Publications Dept. | WWW: http://www.execpc.com/~helberg/ SPSS, Inc. | Speaking only for myself....


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page