LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1997)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 15 Apr 1997 16:57:21 GMT
Reply-To:     Jodi Elliott <jelliott@RS1.TCS.TULANE.EDU>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jodi Elliott <jelliott@RS1.TCS.TULANE.EDU>
Organization: Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
Subject:      Logistic Regression

I have run a logistic regression analysis and need to report the results in table format. Looking at examples in the published literature, I see that several people have reported b (clear enough), s.e. (also clear), chi-square, df, and something called "Pseudo R^2." Each predictor has a b and s.e. reported, along with "Unique Pseudo R^2," then there is a "Pseudo R^2" at the bottom of the table, after the chi-square.

My SPSS output provides -2 LL for both constant-only model and for full model, a Goodness of Fit value, Model Chi-Square along with df and significance level, Improvement of full model over constant-only model, B, S.E., Wald, df, Sig (of Wald statistic, I believe), R, and Exp(B) which I have heard from this group is an odds ratio.

Can someone tell me what, if anything, in my output corresponds to this "Pseudo R^2" that people seem to be reporting out? Do I need to specify something in my syntax that I'm currently missing? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.

Jodi Callahan Tulane University


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page