LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 1997)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 9 May 1997 13:19:20 GMT
Reply-To:     David Nichols <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         David Nichols <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Organization: SPSS, Inc.
Subject:      Re: Empty Cells

In article <336933c8.31946960@news.ilstu.edu>, Wolfgang Viechtbauer <wviecht@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu> wrote: >I am trying to run a 2x2x2x3 ANOVA, and it is no surprise that there >are some empty cells. Nevertheless, all factors are important, and >therefore I am looking for some way to still run the analysis. Is >there any possibility of handling emtpy cells in a general linear >model with SPSS (7.0)? In fact, I am not quite sure what to do about >the situation in general. I probably should collect more data in the >hope that the cells will fill up ... > >Any suggestions or comments? > >Wolfgang

The GLM procedure offers all the options I've seen anywhere for dealing with empty cells, but the problems created by them are complex and require the analyst to understand what is implied by the lack of data. In general, empty cells result in redundant columns in the design matrix, and a loss of ability to estimate interaction effects. In models where you have interactions and are trying to make statements about confounded or contained lower order effects, the complications introduced are even more problematic. I see this as less of an issue than many do, since I don't try to estimate a single main effect in the presence of an interaction, since that's willfully ignoring the implications of the model you've fitted. If you're working in an area where you have good reason not to bother with certain interactions, the presence of empty cells may not cause any problems at all.

On GLM specifically, I would caution that the EMMEANS results for contained effects may not be correct in the presence of empty cells. This has been noted on the group before, and is being remedied for an update release later in the year. I can show you how to get correct values out of the GLM or MANOVA procedures for these cases.

Bottom line: think about the model(s) that you want to fit and the cells that are empty, and what this is going to imply about what you can and cannot estimate. Milliken and Johnson's book _Analysis of Messy Data, Vol. 1: Designed Experiments_ is a good resource, with the irritating exception of the fact that the arithmetic in some of their examples is incorrect. Searle's _Linear Models for Unbalanced Data_ is another useful text.

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Nichols Senior Support Statistician SPSS, Inc. Phone: (312) 329-3684 Internet: nichols@spss.com Fax: (312) 329-3668 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page