LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 1997)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 10 Jun 1997 19:30:47 -0500
Reply-To:     heft@swbell.net
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Laura and Bill Heft <heft@SWBELL.NET>
Organization: Southwestern Bell Internet Services
Subject:      Tukey's HSD post-hoc test output
Comments: To: SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU#!rnews69242
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;

I am a new SPSS user and I am having trouble interpreting/reconcilling

the Tukey HSD Multiple Comparisons and Homogeneous Subset reports.

1. My ANOVA showed significant f-tests for 6 variables (significant mean differences between at least one group). On the Tukey HSD output report, for one of the variables the Multiple Comparisons test showed no significant differences between the subgroups. In addition, while the Multiple Comparisons report showed no significant differences, the Homogeneous Subgroups showed significant differences.

2. On the Multiple Comparisons report, some of the larger mean

differences between subgroups were not significant, while some of the

smaller mean differences were significant (also standard deviations were

comparable).

Can someone help me interpret these outcomes? Am I reading the report

incorrectly? I'm attaching my output file.

Thanks very much,

Laura Heft: heft@swbell.net


2out.spo [application/octet-stream]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page