LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1997)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 25 Jun 1997 17:38:59 GMT
Reply-To:     David Nichols <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         David Nichols <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Organization: SPSS, Inc.
Subject:      Re: Homogeneity of Variance and Repeated measures

In article <5origb$hjq$1@news.fsu.edu>, James D. Young <jyoung@mailer.fsu.edu> wrote: >This is more of a stats question than an SPSS question, but here goes... > >When running a repated measures ANOVA, SPSS spits out both univariate >homogeneity of variance tests for each level of my repeated factor (e.g., >Bartlett-Box) and Multivariate test for Homogeneity of Dispersion matrices >(e.g., Boxs M). When reporting my Within subjects effects, which >homogeneity factor am I concerned with? Frankly, I have no idea what the >latter test even is. Should I report both? > >Your wisdom would be greatly appreciated > >James

The Box test is really more appropriate, because the assumption of equality of covariance matrices is what's necessary for the tests done with repeated measures to be strictly valid (this is necessary, not sufficient, for the averaged univariate approach tests, which also require the circularity or sphericity condition to be met). Unfortunately, Box's M test isn't particularly robust, but I don't know of an accepted alternative.

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Nichols Senior Support Statistician SPSS, Inc. Phone: (312) 329-3684 Internet: nichols@spss.com Fax: (312) 329-3668 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page