Date:         Thu, 27 Nov 1997 23:11:12 -0500
Reply-To:     REXX Programming discussion list <REXXLIST@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
Sender:       REXX Programming discussion list <REXXLIST@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         "F. Scott Ophof" <fsophof@MAIN.BLCLINKS.NET>
Subject:      Re: REXX and Windows 95
In-Reply-To:  <347a9b98.0@news1.ibm.net> from "Solomon Fried" at Nov 25,
              97 03:28:26 am
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Solomon Fried wrote:
> There is a version of Rexx in the Windows NT Resource Kit.
> A better option is Personal Rexx for Windows by Quercus Systems.
 
Why is Personal REXX for Windows a better option?
I'm not (dis)agreeing.  Just want to find out the reasons for your
qualification.
And whose version of REXX is it in the Win/NT Resource Kit?
 
 
Regards,
$$/    F. Scott Ophof    <FSOphof@BLCLinks.net>    Member of RexxLA