Date:         Mon, 2 Feb 1998 18:55:52 -0500
Reply-To:     Josh Sacco <josh@PILOT.MSU.EDU>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Josh Sacco <josh@PILOT.MSU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: var comp revisited
Comments: To: "Nichols, David" <nichols@spss.com>
In-Reply-To:  <c=US%a=_%p=spss%l=HERMES-980202222335Z-50681@hermes.spss.c om>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 04:23 PM 2/2/98 -0600, Nichols, David wrote:
>How many levels of the factors are there?
 
 
'E' is the subject number (around 1,000 subjects), 'D' has 4 levels, 'R'
has 3, 'P' has 6
 
>
>David Nichols
>Principal Support Statistician and
>Manager of Statistical Support
>SPSS Inc.
>nichols@spss.com
>
>>----------
>>From:         Josh Sacco[SMTP:josh@PILOT.MSU.EDU]
>>Sent:         Saturday, January 31, 1998 7:11 PM
>>To:   SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU
>>Subject:      var comp revisited
>>
>>hi,
>>
>>I'm using the following syntax:
>>
>>set mxmemory=75000.
>>VARCOMP
>>  y  BY d e p r
>>  /RANDOM = d e p r
>>  /METHOD = REML
>>  /CRITERIA = ITERATE(50)
>>  /CRITERIA = CONVERGE(1.0E-8)
>>  /PRINT = HISTORY (1)
>>  /design=E D R P E*D E*R(p) E*P D*R(p) D*P E*D*R(p) E*D*P.
>>
>>and am getting the following error:
>>
>>The large number of columns in the design matrix will cause integer
overflow.
>>The large number of columns may be due to too many levels in one or more
>>factors, or to higher-order interactions among factors with many levels. It
>>may also be due to too many factors.
>>This command not executed.
>>
>>
>>any ideas?  using values of up to 175MB for the above memory setting didn't
>>help.
>>
>>
>>thanks much!!
>>
>
>