LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 1998, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 7 May 1998 09:03:42 -0700
Reply-To:     Public_Access_Machine <Public_Access_Machine@SBPHRD.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Public_Access_Machine <Public_Access_Machine@SBPHRD.COM>
Organization: SmithKline Beecham
Subject:      %str() vs. %nrstr()
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Does anyone know whether using %nrstr(), when you are sure that there is no macro resolving to be done inside the brackets, is more efficient than using %str()?

I often see %str() in code when it is clear that there is no macro resolution needed and it seems to me that you can avoid having the macro processor scan the function argument if you use %nrstr().

Does this sound right or is there some complication that I'm missing?

Thanks, Stewart Ravenhall mailto: s.g.ravenhall@clara.net -- The opinions expressed in this communication are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page