LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 1998, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 15 May 1998 10:15:55 -0600
Reply-To:     Jack Hamilton <jack_hamilton@HCCOMPARE.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jack Hamilton <jack_hamilton@HCCOMPARE.COM>
Subject:      Re: removing duplicates with NODUPKEY????
Comments: To: rimmkaufman@CRUTCHFIELD.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Alan Rimm-Kaufman <rimmkaufman@CRUTCHFIELD.COM> wrote:

>There's been prior discussion this year on SAS-L about how >NODUPKEY sometimes doesn't remove duplicates... >I recall folks doing arduous multiple sorts to ensure no dups. > >I wasn't tuned into those discussions, but now the issue has become relevant to >me. > >I've heard if you sort twice, that'll remove dups, eg > > proc sort; by a b c d; run; > proc sort nodupkey; by a b c d; run; > >Is that correct? Can someone fill me in on this issue?

See the following SAS Usage Notes:

V6-SORT-B272 Using the SAS sort with NODUPLICATES/NODUPKEY and EQUALS <http://www.sas.com/service/techsup/unotes/V6/B272.html>

V6-SORT-1729 Observations with duplicate BY values not deleted when NODUPKEY used <http://www.sas.com/service/techsup/unotes/V6/1729.html>

V6-SQL-D929 PROC SQL DISTINCT or PROC SORT NODUPKEY output may still have duplicates <http://www.sas.com/service/techsup/unotes/V6/D929.html>

The major problems seem to be with NODUPLICATES rather than NODUPKEYS.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page