LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 1998)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 12 Jun 1998 16:21:37 +1000
Reply-To:     John Reece <reece@RMIT.EDU.AU>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         John Reece <reece@RMIT.EDU.AU>
Subject:      Re. t-test with covariates?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

This problem can be reframed as a within-subjects ANOVA with varying covariates, which is pretty easy to do with MANOVA (I'm a Mac user, so I have no knowledge of doing this in GLM). I can't think of any reason why you would want to approach it using t-tests specifically, and in terms of decision making and ease, treating it in the way I suggested should get you what you want.

>I'm trying to conduct a paired sample t-test with a twist. I want to >adjust each of the two variables in the t-test by another variable before >conducting the test. I understand there's no option to do so in the t-test >command (is there?)... > >Specifically I want to test the difference in means between variables A and >B when variable A is adjusted for the impact of variable A' and variable B >is adjusted for the impact of variable B'. > >My initial thought was to run a linear regression predicting A with A' and >another predicting B with B'. I would save the unstandardized residuals >and test the means of the unstandardized residuals. Well, that didn't >work, because the means both ended up being almost zero (theoretical range >of A and B was 0-10). > >It dawned on me that maybe I should run the same regressions without the >constant in the equation. I did so, and now I get variables with means of >less than one, but still greater than zero. Things still don't seem right. > >Does anyone have any suggestions? Is looking at the unstandardized >residuals without using a constant correct? If not, what is the proper >solution??? +----------------------------------------------------------------+ |John Reece, PhD | |Dept. of Psychology & Intellectual Disability Studies | |RMIT University Phone: +61.3.9925.7512 | |PO Box 71 Fax: +61.3.9925.7303 | |Bundoora VIC 3083 mailto:reece@rmit.edu.au | |AUSTRALIA http://www.rmit.edu.au/departments/ps/reece.htm | +----------------------------------------------------------------+


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page