LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1998)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 8 Jul 1998 14:34:53 -0700
Reply-To:     Bruce L Young <byoung@ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Bruce L Young <byoung@ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU>
Organization: University at Buffalo
Subject:      Teleform: evaluations wanted
Comments: To: SAS-L@VTVM1.CC.VT.EDU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

My department is seriously considering an investment in Cardiff's Teleform software to handle input of our survey forms prior to manipulations and analysis with Access, SAS, and/or SPSS. My sense is that Teleform is a "gold standard" of sorts for OCR and OMR, and that few other programs handle both as effectively - if they handle both at all. I'd greatly appreciate additional feedback on the following:

1. Comparisons of Teleform with other OCR and OMR technologies: Which other programs handle both? What are their advantages and disadvantages, for form developers, for entry personnel, and for analysts?

2. Comparisons of Teleform with manual entry: Does Teleform *really* save time when one accounts for form development, programming, troubleshooting, and form scanning? (I've spoken with a couple of colleagues who refuse to use Teleform because it does not, in their experience.) What are the long-term additional expenses associated with proper use of Teleform?

TIA, Bruce.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page