| Date: | Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:40:54 -0500 |
| Reply-To: | "Nichols, David" <nichols@SPSS.COM> |
| Sender: | "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | "Nichols, David" <nichols@SPSS.COM> |
| Subject: | Re: prblm w. mkappasc macro? |
|
As Rich Ulrich suggested, I'll be glad to clarify the calculations if given
the data. I've tested the macro numerous times and I'm fairly certain the
calculations are accurate. I don't really recommend that measure though, as
it's really a measure of consistency rather than absolute agreement.
David Nichols
Principal Support Statistician and
Manager of Statistical Support
SPSS Inc.
----------
From: mark swiencicki [SMTP:MAS93012@UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 11:19 AM
To: SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU
Subject: prblm w. mkappasc macro?
Has anyone else had a problem with running the MNKAPPASC macro for
determining
overall kappa scores for multiple judges. When i run a job with
6 coders who have a 91% aggreement spread out over 3 values, it gave me a
kappa of .47 when it should have been about .88. Could it be overlooking
the
cases with full agreement? I downloaded the file off the spss. web site
and
saved it as an spss text file, then used the proper commands in the syntax
window: INCLUDE MKAPPASC.SPS.
MKAPPASC VARS=varlist (with my 6 variables named here). PS I used
consecutively numbered integers from 1 - up, so that can't be the problem.
Signed, Help me in Connecticut!
Mark Swiencicki - Univ. of Conn. Sociology
|