Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 12:57:02 -0400
Reply-To: "Paul M. Dorfman" <pdorfma@UCS.ATT.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From: "Paul M. Dorfman" <pdorfma@UCS.ATT.COM>
Organization: Universal Card Services
Subject: Re: Modular recursion in COBOL and SAS (was: Re:Recursion in
SAS-the exact query)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Thank you for having made my day!
Also, thank you for correcting my poor grammar! Please let me show that I have
learned the lesson by writing a grammatically correct sentence: "i dont know
nothing about all them big words".
May I return the favor and point out one minor error that has somehow sneaked
into your reply? The last time I checked in the Webster's, the correct spelling
of the word "becuz" was actually "cuz".
Kindest personal regards,
Aston Lexmart, in part, wrote:
> why would you need a recursive call to link. i doubt you can write macros but
> you could you wouldn't need to use link becuz macros are more powerful. if
> macros were in cobol like in pl1 nobody would use performs. btw, do you check
> your programs the same way you check you grammar? 'attempt' is singular and
> tihs context should of been followed by 'was'.
> i know people on sas-l are too polite to tell you what they really think.
> may have their reasons but i don't really care and say what i think, and i
> all sas-l community will benefit from it and especially folks who are really
> annoyed when they see your name but don't say nothing.
> No hard feelings,