LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1998, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 14 Jul 1998 16:33:15 -0400
Reply-To:     Douglas Dame <dougdame@HPE.UFL.EDU>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Douglas Dame <dougdame@HPE.UFL.EDU>
Subject:      Re: %INCLUDE on MVS 6.09
Comments: cc: Mary Esther Colwell <Mary_Esther_Colwell@FFIC.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <9807141936.AA9793@notesgw.compuserve.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Mary Esther Colwell wrote:

> > Is there any advantage to using multiple '%include' rather > than having the code in one program? >

In addition to the previous answers, the original programmer/s used may have this technique to:

* modularize the program for developing/testing (a %include being very easy to "turn off" once that part of the data processing has been perfected and a non-work SAS dataset has been created to save the results),

or

* simply to make the structure and flow of the program more obvious (e.g., if the %included code amounts to 20, 60, or 200 pages of code).

I do not believe there is a significant impact machine-wise either way, the primary benefit (in this case) is how it helps the programmer/s organize the source code.

HTH

Douglas Dame Shands HealthCare -- Gainesville FL


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page