LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1998)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1998 14:43:22 -0500
Reply-To:     "Nichols, David" <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Nichols, David" <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Subject:      Re: Varcomp capacity

If the design fitted is equivalent to a full factorial, you're asking for 14,430 parameters, about half of which are of course redundant and aliased to 0, but it's still building a design matrix with those columns (there would be 7776 nonredundant parameters). You should consider the design carefully and see about cutting down the size.

David Nichols Principal Support Statistician and Manager of Statistical Support SPSS Inc.

-----Original Message----- From: Tak S. Ha [SMTP:ettsha@USTHK.UST.HK] Sent: Monday, September 07, 1998 11:10 PM To: SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU Subject: Varcomp capacity

When I used VARCOMP with a 4 level partially nested design ( 36(2(9))*12) in SPSS Win 7.5, it refused to process my commnad. Has my command exceeded SPSS capacity? Any suggested solution? Comments and advice much appreciated.

T. S. Ha Hong Kong University of Science & Technology


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page