LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1998)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1998 09:38:26 -0400
Reply-To:     Jeff Mather <Jmather@HARTHOSP.ORG>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jeff Mather <Jmather@HARTHOSP.ORG>
Subject:      one-way repeated measures
Content-Type: text/plain

I have a simple design with 15 subjects treated with four different regimens. I know if I use GLM repeated measures ANOVA I can get the within subject differences, but I can't get post-hoc comparison's (it's only set up for between subject factors-and I have none).

To obtain multiple comparison's, I've rearranged my data so I can run a one-way ANOVA. Here, I can get post-hoc testing, as the setup now sees the regimen as a factor. My question: I don't believe that any of the post-hoc tests offered in the simple 1-way anova are designed specifically for a paired comparison. Please let me know if I'm wrong here. What I've done is gone back to the original data set up and performed the post-hoc tests using all the combinations for a paired t-test, and manually adjusted the error rate by incorporating a bonferronni correction.

this is pretty combersum. Is my line of thinking correct here, is this the easiest way to get the post-hoc's done in a simple repeated measures design.

thanks jeff


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page