LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1998)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1998 10:31:27 -0500
Reply-To:     "Nichols, David" <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Nichols, David" <nichols@SPSS.COM>
Subject:      Re: Repeated measures or independant samples

I don't know of any way to get an independent samples mean comparison out of SPSS with the data set up in two columns (aside from programming your own computations).

The assumption that doing an independent samples test rather than a repeated or paired samples test will result only in a power loss under an alternative rather than increasing Type I error under the null is predicated on the assumption of a certain level of positive correlation among the time points. That's usually the case with repeated measures data, but it's not the only thing that can logically or mathematically occur.

This is actually a pretty complicated situation, with many things to consider, particularly with regard to missing data mechanisms. One approach would be to just apply mixed models methods to the problem, which would generally require rearranging the data so that there are multiple cases per subject. But the best thing I could advise would be to have a good statistician familiar with your substantive area look at the problem carefully and make appropriate recommendations.

David Nichols Principal Support Statistician and Manager of Statistical Support SPSS Inc.

-----Original Message----- From: Damon A. Muller [SMTP:fvp@RAV.ORG.AU] Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 1998 12:48 AM To: SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU Subject: Repeated measures or independant samples

Hi Folks,

I'm afraid this might be a bit of a basic question, but my stats is a little rusty, and in my present job I don't have a local stats mentor I can go to for help!

We are conducting research on the efficacy of several domestic violence interventions, such as perpetrator groups and couples counselling, and we are administering pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, as well as another questionnaire at a 6-month follow-up period, to clients.

Ideally, this would call for a repeated measures design. Unfortunately, we are dealing with a very difficult sample, and getting all of the data is proving to be extremely difficult. As such, we have lots of pre and post data, and as much 6-month data as we can wring out of them. But, there are lots of gaps, and there are very few people for whom we have all three sets of data :(

If I had better data, I could use, for example, a paired-sample t-test to compare pre and 6-month scores on tests such as the ABI (a pencil-and-paper test for measuring abusive behaviour). This would be the 'propper' way to do it, IIRC.

Would it be a Bad Thing to use an independant-samples t-test with the above data, above and beyond the loss of statistical power? Are there perhaps better ways for me to approach the analysis?

Now for the ObSPSS: Iff I can use an indepentand sample t-test (or similar), is there any easy way to convice SPSS (version 8.0, Win95) to use data that is laid out accross the page, with no grouping variable, rather than down it?

Thanks in advance for your help/flames/whatever,

damon (who wishes he hadn't lost his undergrad stats books!)

----- Damon Muller (fvp@rav.org.au) * Research Assistant (Family Violence Intervention & Research Project) * Webhacker (http://www.rav.org.au/fvirp) * Occasional student


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page