LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1998)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 13 Sep 1998 21:49:30 GMT
Reply-To:     Richard F Ulrich <wpilib+@PITT.EDU>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Richard F Ulrich <wpilib+@PITT.EDU>
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
Subject:      Re: Qualitative by Qualitative Interactions in Multiple Regression

Van Kirk, Jeff (VanKirk@PSYCHIATRY.UCHC.EDU) wrote: : I'm running an OLS multiple regression with 6 control and predictor : variables and several of their interactions. 2 of the predictors are : dichotomous. Is it appropriate to run their interaction using the usual : product term approach? It seems to me that the resulting residuals : would by definition violate the normality assumption? Thanks

Is your question about using dichotomous variables, or about computing and using the interaction?

Dichotomous variables don't leave extreme outlyers, which is usual bugaboo of bad predictors. So they are ordinarily okay. The test you get on a dichotomy is the same test as if the variable were a factor in an ANCOVA (analysis of COvariance).

The interaction is just another dichotomy, which does not even correlate much with the main effects if you have coded the main effects as (-1,1) before you multiple them.

-- Rich Ulrich, biostatistician wpilib+@pitt.edu http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html Univ. of Pittsburgh


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page