LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 1998)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 30 Oct 1998 12:30:58 -0800
Reply-To:     Potato <potato@SEE-SIG.CUHK.EDU.HK>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Potato <potato@SEE-SIG.CUHK.EDU.HK>
Organization: The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Subject:      Re: Post hoc tests for repeated measures
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Stephen P. Baker wrote: > > The post-hoc tests all assume independent errors, and since repeated measures > are > not independent, these tests are generally invalid in that setting.

Are there any literature related to this issue? I searched the text at hand, and surprisingly found very little discussion on doing post-hoc tests for repeated measures. What confused me more is that Statistica 4.5 allows us to apply many post hoc tests on the cell means of any designs, including within-subject designs and mixed-designs. Although using adjusted paired t-tests seem to be the "safest" approach, the power might be way too low and doesn't use all information at hand. I'd like to know more on this topic. Many thanks in advance.

-- =================================================================== Shu-Fai Cheung (Potato) email: potato@cuhk.edu.hk Psychology Department The Chinese University of Hong Kong ===================================================================


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page