LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 1998)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 26 Oct 1998 09:50:19 +0100
Reply-To:     Rolf Kjoeller <rolf.kjoeller@GET2NET.DK>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Rolf Kjoeller <rolf.kjoeller@GET2NET.DK>
Subject:      Re: Is my selection procedure random ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi SPSS-X

- Paul Newton and I have been corresponding a bit offlist about his samplingquestion. I think what we have come up with is in line with the suggestions given by David F. Greenberg and Dale Pietrzak:

- since the sampling is done with replacement, you can see the selection of one particular word as a binomialexperiment with n=2468 and pii=1/4724. The following are the probabilities of selecting one particular word 0 to 10 times in such an experiment. cpx are cummulated probabilities, p(x<=X), while px is p(x=X). Judging from this, selecting one particular word 10 times is rather unlikely: x cpx px 0 ,5930 ,5930 1 ,9029 ,3099 2 ,9839 ,0809 3 ,9980 ,0141 4 ,9998 ,0018 5 1,0000 ,0002 6 1,0000 ,0000 7 1,0000 ,0000 8 1,0000 ,0000 9 1,0000 ,0000 10 1,0000 ,0000

Paul has suggested, and I tend to agree, that you can use these probabilities to build a table with expected numbers of words drawn x times, and actual numbers of words drawn x times, and then do a chisquaretest:

x sample expected 0 n11 n12 1 n21 n22 2 n31 n32 3 n41 n42 ... ... ... 10+ n101 n102

Does this make sense to you?

Rolf Kjoeller

-- e-mail: rolf.kjoeller@get2net.dk webpage: http://hjem.get2net.dk/rolf.kjoeller


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page