LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 1998, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 16 Oct 1998 11:47:02 -0400
Reply-To:     CHUCK MAKINSON <clmakinson@GOODYEAR.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         CHUCK MAKINSON <clmakinson@GOODYEAR.COM>
Subject:      Re: SPDS vs SQL Server vs Oracle - question
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

It sounds like you have data warehouse (a collection of datasets stored in one place) not an actual DATA WAREHOUSE built using the SAS/D.W. product. The D.W. product makes it easy to manage and maintain views or tables of the operational data in a Star Schema or other denormalized formats optimized for user access. In most cases a query against normalized RMDS data, particularly if joins are involved, will be slow in comparison to D.W. structured data regardless of the choice of Oracle, SQL Server, etc. The tradeoff will be additional space and refresh frequency requirements.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page