LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 1999)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:35:04 -0800
Reply-To:     Uwe Scheper <apm49@RZ.UNI-KIEL.D400.DE>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Uwe Scheper <apm49@RZ.UNI-KIEL.D400.DE>
Organization: Universitaet Kiel/Lehrstuhl fuer Agrarmarketing
Subject:      Re: Categorical Dependent variables in regression - Thanks
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hello All, hello Joanna!

Joanna, I tried to mail you direct but it didn't work somehow. Could you mail me the answers you got to your question. I have a similar problem and would be happy to get some more information.

Thank you,

Uwe from Kiel .... somewhere in Germany

> Joanna wrote: > > Hi All, > > I would just like to so thanks to all who answered my question on > using categorical dependent variables in regression. Eventually after > reading your posts and reading about the methods you suggested I > decided that I didn't want to do a regression after all. In any event, > my work computer's SPSS is only the Base module (my employers decided > TextSmart would be a better investment that advanced modules - bad > idea) and I haven't the tools to do what I want. > > Thank you all in any case - at least I know I can do it if I want! > > -- > Joanna > ~~**~~ > Change the spice to space to reply > jsmith@spice.net.au

> Joanna wrote: > > Hi All, > > I would just like to so thanks to all who answered my question on > using categorical dependent variables in regression. Eventually after > reading your posts and reading about the methods you suggested I > decided that I didn't want to do a regression after all. In any event, > my work computer's SPSS is only the Base module (my employers decided > TextSmart would be a better investment that advanced modules - bad > idea) and I haven't the tools to do what I want. > > Thank you all in any case - at least I know I can do it if I want! > > -- > Joanna > ~~**~~ > Change the spice to space to reply > jsmith@spice.net.au

-- ***********dipl.rer.pol.*****Uwe Scheper*****dipl.agr.oec************ *** http://www.uni-kiel.de/agrarmarketing/Mitarb/US/Uschepe1.htm **** **************** mailto:apm49@rz.uni-kiel.d400.de ******************* **"Lieber einmal mehr um die Ecke denken, als voll gegen die Wand!"**


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page